Comments on: Uncut Cock: Hot or Not? http://blog.guysgocrazy.com/wheres-baldo/ Behind the scenes of the biggest gay sex party in the world Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:19:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Andy http://blog.guysgocrazy.com/wheres-baldo/#comment-2548 Andy Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:12:06 +0000 http://blog.guysgocrazy.com/?p=613#comment-2548 I get all worked up over circumcision. The fact that people do that to their babies is revolting and morally unjustifiable. It's a bloody, violent, imprecise mess of a procedure that victims fight tooth and nail to prevent, but of course they're two days old and strapped down to a tub, so there's nothing they can do. Hating on foreskin just contributes to the cycle of violence, but I wonder sometimes if so many men do because they have no control over their own status, which is the other thing that makes it so evil. That's not your body to modify. That's not your flesh to take. It's an act of violence in no uncertain terms. As for the result, I don't want any functionality to be missing, but a guy doesn't need to have it all to turn me on. That's another thing about circumcision, though: it's no singular thing. The only thing all circumcised men have in common is that their most sensitive erogenous nerve endings have been removed. Even if their head is still completely covered with skin, if they got a partial, those nerves are gone forever. From there, the geometry can vary a lot. Is the skin left loose or tight? Is the scar high or low? Is it symmetrical? Did it cause skin bridges? I was with a guy who had a low (close to the head; nearly all outer foreskin) and extremely tight cut, and I didn't know what to do with it. I was just afraid I'd hurt him. Then I was with a guy with a big thick one and a high, loose cut. That one I liked. Sliding action, bulbous head, rubbery texture. I wouldn't change a thing, but his parents shouldn't have, either. I get all worked up over circumcision. The fact that people do that to their babies is revolting and morally unjustifiable. It’s a bloody, violent, imprecise mess of a procedure that victims fight tooth and nail to prevent, but of course they’re two days old and strapped down to a tub, so there’s nothing they can do. Hating on foreskin just contributes to the cycle of violence, but I wonder sometimes if so many men do because they have no control over their own status, which is the other thing that makes it so evil. That’s not your body to modify. That’s not your flesh to take. It’s an act of violence in no uncertain terms.

As for the result, I don’t want any functionality to be missing, but a guy doesn’t need to have it all to turn me on. That’s another thing about circumcision, though: it’s no singular thing. The only thing all circumcised men have in common is that their most sensitive erogenous nerve endings have been removed. Even if their head is still completely covered with skin, if they got a partial, those nerves are gone forever. From there, the geometry can vary a lot. Is the skin left loose or tight? Is the scar high or low? Is it symmetrical? Did it cause skin bridges? I was with a guy who had a low (close to the head; nearly all outer foreskin) and extremely tight cut, and I didn’t know what to do with it. I was just afraid I’d hurt him. Then I was with a guy with a big thick one and a high, loose cut. That one I liked. Sliding action, bulbous head, rubbery texture. I wouldn’t change a thing, but his parents shouldn’t have, either.

]]> By: Jamie http://blog.guysgocrazy.com/wheres-baldo/#comment-310 Jamie Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:06:23 +0000 http://blog.guysgocrazy.com/?p=613#comment-310 Cut by far. Still think that GGC RULES!! Cut by far. Still think that GGC RULES!!

]]>